Skip to main content

Network planning guide

Miami versus Los Angeles inventory placement

Choose inventory placement from order and inbound data, not from a city label. Miami-first can fit Southeast, Caribbean, and Latin America-linked flows; Los-Angeles-first can fit West Coast and Pacific-linked flows. A split network is justified only when the measured service or transportation benefit is greater than the extra inventory, replenishment, and control cost.

Reviewed 2026-08-22 Evidence owner: Fulfillment Hub USA Content and Operations

Decision support

Placement decision framework

Use the same definitions and evidence across every option. A comparison is not reliable when one path uses best-case assumptions and another uses observed operating data.

SignalMiami-first indicatorLos-Angeles-first indicatorSplit-network trigger
Customer demandOrder density is concentrated in Florida or the SoutheastOrder density is concentrated in California or the WestBoth regions have durable volume and service-level pressure
Inbound flowSuppliers or imports naturally feed Southeast lanesSuppliers or imports naturally feed Pacific lanesInbound can be allocated reliably without costly rebalancing
Parcel profileModeled zones and service commitments favor a Southeast originModeled zones and service commitments favor a West Coast originTwo origins materially improve the weighted network result
Inventory depthCatalog can support one regional stock positionCatalog can support one regional stock positionEach location can hold a useful assortment and safety stock
Operational riskOne node meets continuity and recovery requirementsOne node meets continuity and recovery requirementsDual-node continuity value exceeds added coordination risk

Execution

Run the placement analysis

Move to the next step only when the evidence and owner for the current step are clear.

  1. 01

    Map customer demand

    Use at least a representative order period by postal code, order value, units, package dimensions, promised service, and return origin. Separate stable demand from campaigns and one-time launches.

  2. 02

    Map inbound supply

    Document supplier origin, port or airport, drayage, appointment lead time, purchase-order cadence, customs ownership, and the variability between planned and actual arrival.

  3. 03

    Model one-node options first

    Calculate transportation, inventory, replenishment, receiving, and service outcomes for Miami-only and Los-Angeles-only placement using the same assumptions.

  4. 04

    Test a split by SKU family

    Allocate only products with enough regional velocity and inventory depth. Include transfer cost, stock imbalance, fragmented safety stock, and added planning labor.

  5. 05

    Choose service and cost thresholds

    Define the minimum improvement that justifies a second node, plus the inventory accuracy and replenishment thresholds required to keep it active.

  6. 06

    Review the network on a cadence

    Re-run the model when demand, suppliers, parcel rates, product dimensions, marketplace mix, or customer promises change materially.

Boundaries

Limitations and review triggers

  • Port proximity alone does not determine total landed cost, receiving speed, parcel performance, or inventory availability.
  • A split network can increase stockouts if demand allocation and replenishment are less accurate than the model assumes.
  • FHU location suitability and capacity must be confirmed against the actual product, workflow, timing, and operating scope.